Prosecutor Blerim Igrista ordered the 48-hour ban of a 59-year-old after his cow entered the court of the Court in Gracanica. The judge interviewed by police described the damage in green as minimal.
In another file of the same prosecutor, for an accident in which a passenger lost his life, the court filed an indictment after Igrista had raised him without questioning the defendant. According to Appeal, the prosecution also left unanswered the court’s request for the execution of the indictment.
The judge described the damage as minimal, the owner was sent to keep
The case in Gracanica occurred on November 13, 2026. According to information provided by the Signal newspaper, against 59-year-old Hashim Miftari, the case was initiated for criminal work, including disaster or damage to property. After interviewing the parties, Igrista ordered the Mosttar held for 48 hours.
Justice Sinisa Borisavljevic said in the police that security workers had removed the animals from the yard three to four times during that day. He said the damage to the green was minimal and that police had been called to distract the owner from caring for the animals.
The minister, who voluntarily made a statement to the police, said he had lost the cow and that this was the first time she had entered the court of the Court.
Igrista had also sought detention for an 81-year-old grandpa
In another case, Igrishta had sought to appoint detention to an 81-year-old. The elderly man had requested the opening of schools for his grandchildren. The detention requirement base and the court’s decision on that request remain to be confirmed.
A passenger lost his life, the indictment arose without questioning the driver
The accident occurred on 14 August 2023, near the siege to Mitrovica, at the entrance of Pristina. According to the indictment, A.R. He was driving 136 miles an hour in an area where the restriction was 40. The car got off the road, and a passenger lost his life.
The Constitutional Court in Pristina dropped the indictment on October 1st 2025. Apel left the decision in effect on December 3rd of that year. According to Apel’s reasoning reflected in public reporting, the defendant’s interrogation before the establishment of the indictment was mandatory for the work for which the sentence of one to eight years in prison was presented.
In complaint, Igrista had claimed that the Foundation had not returned the charge of fulfillment. Apel found that the court had asked the prosecutor for the case of the defendant’s statement and that the request was left unanswered. Appeal also dismissed the Igrist’s argument that the old Code of Criminal Procedure should be implemented.
Disciplinary Process Against Igristes Reported
On February 2026, it was reported that Pristina’s chief prosecutor, Zejrullah Gashi, had initiated disciplinary procedure against Igrist for handling the fatal accident file. The outcome of the procedure and the pronunciation of any measures remain unconfirmed.
In Gracanica’s case, the prosecutor’s question remains what made the ban necessary for 48 hours when the owner had voluntarily issued and the judge interviewed described the damage as minimal?
Note: The people mentioned in this news are considered innocent until their guilt is confirmed by court’s firm form.
The signal where the truth speaks before the news!
Source Layer: Signal