The businessman who entered the blacklist after the municipality’s fraud complaint receives tender from the same municipality

Mitrovica municipality, which three months earlier had requested by the Procuration Research Organisation (O The EPS has now awarded contract a consortium that includes another company and the same businessman. It’s about Fehmi Krasniqi, owner of the company Rahovica. The S.P.K., which after the Mitrovica municipality complaint was put on the blacklist for eight months. Meanwhile, in another tender of this municipality, part of the winning consortium is ʹ RAHOV The ICA COMPANY SH.P.K., also owned by Krasniqi.

Insander newspaper

The contract for building roads and sidewalks in the city and villages has been granted to the consortium consisting of three companies: ) CAPITAL X FETU SH.P.K., ) SH.P.K. and N.N.A. ) WOR LD MEDIUM.

The tender value is over 572 thousand euros.

But this is not the only public contract the company has received during this period. On October 16, 2026, éhovica S.P.K. It has also been rewarded by the Podujevo Community for building a magistrate’s road to Bedri Ahmeti Street, worth nearly 200 thousand euros.

The Mitrovica municipality had itself been the one who had sent Fehmi Krasniqi’s other company to the Tender Court.

Comuna to Ríhovica S. The P.K has demanded punitive measures because of suspicions that a procurement procedure was handed over documentation with false content.

O The EPS had approved the municipality’s request and disqualified the company from participating in public procurement for eight months, from August 6th 2026 to April 5, 2027.

Why did Fehmi Krasniqi’s company enter the blacklist?

The case for which the Mitrovica municipality had sought the disqualification of Rahovica) S.P.K. It was about the tender for street asphalt in Bajgora, Rashan, Trsten, Kutlovc and Vlachi.

In that procedure, the municipality had raised doubts about the documentation delivered by the company, specifically for a trailer presented as part of the technical capacities.

According to O decision The EPS, in the submitted documentation, was incompatible with data and ownership of the device. After considering the case, the panel had approved the Komuna application and established the company’s disqualification for eight months.

What’s he saying? S.P.K.?

In a response to the Insander Journal, éhovica Comece) S.P.K. He has named the decision O The EP’s disqualified as biased, unfair, and baseless.

The company claims the case has nothing to do with falsification of documentation and that during the mandate of O’s Prosecution Panel member The EPS, the Potterstone Vedas, has been constantly damaged.

According to the company, no subject examined during this period has been placed in its favour.

Rhahovica Comerce) S.P.K. It also claims that Potter has a conflict of interest due to family ties with the company ‘%Eurokos Holding.

The company has made it known that for this matter it has deposited criminal speculation in the Special Prosecutor and has requested forensic examinations to prove the authenticity of documentation.

As far as it’s concerned The USPK, which is part of the consortium rewarded by the Mitrovica municipality, the company says it is a special legal subject, with its documentation and responsibility.

)Rahovica Company is a special legal subject, with its documentation and responsibilities, and should be assessed according to its legal criteria and capacitiesí, they say in response/insight.org/

Source Layer: Insander